Humpty Dumpty

The main character in the Humpty Dumpty nursery rhyme is assumed to be a raw egg. However, it is equally apropos if applied to matter that is subjected to heat of such extreme intensity that the resulting expansion causes the atoms and potentially the electrons, neutrons and protons of which made, to disintegrate. It is quite generally understood that an explosion, such as fuel in the cylinder of an engine or the material used in making bombs, is in fact rapidly consummated combustion. Combustion is a process where a small amount of heat inserted into a fuel mixture causes some of the atoms, of which the fuel is made, to expand. The resulting expansion fractures the forces that bind the components of which those atoms were made with the energy that produced the binding forces released as heat, which in turn causes a “chain reaction” of expansion and fragmentation. With rapid fragmentation of the fuel’s atoms there is a rapid release of heat and the resulting rapid expansion is seen as an explosion. Release of the energy that produces the forces that bind the components of which atoms and atoms themselves are made, is the source of all heat in the universe and when those forces are fragmented you could correctly say that Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

Heat is fundamental to physics and creation. It is the increase in heat content that causes the expansion of atoms by which action their state is changed from solid to liquid to gas or vapor and subsequently to plasma. In the pure plasma state, all binding forces of the involved material would have been fragmented. In that state, all that remains is the energy which is recognized under other circumstances as “the charge” by which a difference of potential is produced for example in an electrical system. It is the charge that produces the repelling action that notables such as Sir William Gilbert (1540-1603), Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790) and Charles Coulomb (1736-1806) attempted to explain. It is the same charge that is inherent in lines of magnetic force that are impressed upon the conductors in a magna-motive force generator to create the difference of potential used to force the movement of electrons in an electrical system or in the lines of magnetic force that produces the magnetic field of the sun or the earth and whose infinite repelling force precludes the union of those charges.

The process of releasing the charge energy inherent in atoms is the process that takes place in our sun. Recognize first that the amount of charge energy (heat) released on the sun exceeds the absorption capability of remaining atoms. Therefore, with no atoms within which to be absorbed, no binding force of gravity, but with infinite repelling force, the released energy rises to the surface of the sun. However, because of the repelling force of the sun’s magnetic field the released energy is contained, concentrated and compressed in that area of the sun called the corona. Eventually, pressure inside the corona is relieved when the sun’s magnetic field is distended as has come to be recognized as the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) and the solar wind.

This Humpty Dumpty has the potential of showing the way to the development of alternative fuel sources. All that is required is recognition that the energy that produces the binding of atoms is a fundamental component in the assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons and the entire universe and it makes no difference if the atoms make hydrocarbons or uranium.

Alternative Fuels Not Alternative Energy

All fuels harbor a common energy and all of the forces in the universe are the product of that one common energy. The search for an alternative energy is in reality a search for a suitable alternative source from which that common energy can be transformed economically to produce a desired force. All forces in the universe are the product of the energy that provides the force used in the assembly of electrons, protons and neutrons and in the binding of those components to give atoms their physical and behavioral characteristics as well as to give atoms, and thereby all things, the ability to behave. Some forces, such as the action of muscles, the movement of electrons, the action of gravity, or the binding of elemental components of atoms, are produced by the inherent behavioral characteristics of that energy (I. E: contracting and repelling) acting directly. Other forces, such as expansion produced by heat or the action of radiating light, are produced when that energy is released following application to produce those functions.
Consider that the force derived from combustion is the result of expansion produced by heat released when the forces that bind the atoms and molecules of fuel are fragmented (disrupted or discontinued) thereby releasing the energy that produced those binding forces. Following release that energy is commonly described as heat. It makes no difference if the energy had been producing the binding force in muscles, hydrocarbon molecules, or the components that makeup the nucleus of a uranium atom. It is the one common energy.
We may be more successful in the search for an alternative fuel if this fact was given appropriate consideration.

Creation Physics 101

The expression “a priori” that seemed to be a favorite of Albert Einstein means essentially, derived through the process of reasoning. Webster says the term is derived from Latin meaning from something prior. It is the process used to establish that all things in the universe are made of atoms that are in turn the assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons, and the energy that bind those components to give atoms their physical and behavioral characteristics as well as their ability to behave, and subsequently the physical and behavioral characteristics of all things. That conclusion derived a priori establishes the fundamental principle of physics from which all physics principles have developed and from that conclusion a priori, is the fundamental principle of creation.
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) held to the concept promoted by Epicurus (341-271 BC) that all things are made of minute particles of matter from which the preceding conclusions were subsequently developed. Newton concluded essentially that, inherent in every body (assembly of atoms) is an “affinity” for another body (assembly of atoms) with the strength of that “affinity” in proportion to the mass of the constituent components of the body in each instance. Other notables, such as Galileo (1564-1642), developed the concept that the force responsible for gravity (affinity or gravitational attraction) originates from the core center of the mass of an assembly, which force causes all objects to “fall” with the same acceleration. Then a priori, it stands that each proton or neutron (assemblies of mass) and each assembly of protons and neutrons (atoms) has an originating center or core center for its inherent gravity producing force.
The concept of multiple centers from which gravitational force is exerted was defined by August Mobius (1790–1868) as a barycenter. The physics involved is employed in astronomy to explain the interaction behavior of objects in space. NASA explains the term barycenter at http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/baryctr.shtml and the on line encyclopedia Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/barycenter. (Both current as of this writing) It stands therefore a priori, that if the principles associated with barycenters are valid for astronomy they are valid for all of physics. Including the barycenter concept along with the fundamental principle of physics as previously defined opens the door to understanding the four mysterious forces that stymied Albert Einstein and the science community to this day.
For example, insight into the mysterious process by which heat and light are produced when electrons are forced to move from atom to atom in the filament of a light bulb is made possible. Consider that the physical composition of a light bulb remains unchanged with no additional physical thing admitted to cause the light bulb to produce heat and light except electrons. However, since the same number of electrons exits a light bulb as enters the bulb it is a priori, not the electrons that are consumed in the production of the heat and light given off by a light bulb. Continuing a priori, since the energy applied to produce movement of electrons through the electrical power system is consumed by that action, that cause is not available to be consumed in the bulb to produce heat and light. The answer is evident when consideration begins with the fundamental principle of physics, which says that there are links of force that bind electrons in the formation of the atoms of which the lamp filament is made. Therefore, it must be concluded a priori that the links of force that bind an electron to an atom are fragmented when electrons are force to move from atom to atom and that it is the energy that produces those links of binding force that is released in the form of heat and light.
When the barycenter concept is added for consideration, it is evident a priori that two binding links are fragmented for each electron as they are moved from atom to atom along the lamp filament. There is a weaker (less mass therefore less strength) constant strength link that binds an electron to a proton barycenter/core-center which produces characteristics corresponding to those associated with heat. There also is a varying strength atom specific link that binds the electron to the atom barycenter/core-enter which produces characteristics corresponding to those associated with light including the variation is color shown to be peculiar to each type atom. The strength of the electron binding links as pertains to the barycenter of atoms varies because the mass and therefore barycenter strength varies with atom size. Also, the orbit radius varies in proportion to the size of the atom thereby producing variation in the force applied in binding the various electrons.
There is a third heretofore undefined phenomena associated with barycenters and the behavior of electrons. (Since previously undefined, call it the Pelton principle.) Those familiar with electric circuits understand the significance of establishing and maintaining insulation and isolation. However, it has not been recognized that the act of insulating and isolating the electric system conductors causes the creation of a new barycenter that runs the entire length of the insulated-isolated system from which binding links are established between that barycenter and electrons. Normally, with the mass of the electric system spread so sparingly over great distances, such barycenter does not have sufficient “charge” strength or a directionally acting difference of potential with which to produce any noticeable effect. However, when a quantity of the directionally acting charge that produce the “affinity” between barycenters and electrons is superimposed on the insulated-isolated electrical system, the electric system barycenter acquires the power with which to directionally force the movement of electrons from atom to atom along the system.
Directionally acting “affinity” charges, commonly called a difference of potential, are generated on an insulated-isolated electrical system by using either chemical action as in a battery or by physically forcing charges in the form of magnetic lines of force onto the windings of a magna-motive force (MMF) generator. Again, those familiar with electric circuits recognize that directionally acting magnetic force is revealed only when electrons are in the process of being moved from atom to atom as in the flow of electricity whether the “affinity” charge was established by chemical action or MMF generator. Consequently, since the magnetic force revealed through movement of electrons is the same magnetic force used in an MMF generator to impress a directionally acting difference of potential charge on the insulated-isolated system barycenter, it is concluded a priori that the magnetic forces in each instance are one and the same.
While revealing the processes involved in producing gravity, heat, light, electricity and magnetism should be of considerable interest, the principle intent is to use those proven phenomena to demonstrate empirically, as was done by Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein, that the involved forces are the product of the same energy that provides the force employed in making and binding electrons, protons and neutrons to make atoms that are fundamental to physics and creation.

Modern Science

This post is in response to an item by Father Jonathan published on Fox News, 15 Febtruary. The full effect may not be evident without benefit of the Father Jonathan article.


Duck, the Good Book is on its way. You have fallen for the trap that the practitioners of Relativism employ. You rationalize that we now have a “modern” science so that it is now OK to exclude the practice of a priori as was done in the past, as not admissible as science because that involves some degree of philosophy. Albert Einstein, the father of modern physics used a priori in developing his Theory of Relativity. Einstein summarily dismissed a priori the concept of gravitational attraction then espoused by the community of scientists since the concepts involved “seemed quite contrary to everyday experience”.

By that assertion Einstein sent the question of how or by what manner material points could act upon one another at-a-distance, packing down the hall. By that assertion Einstein made acceptable to “modern” scientists, that denial of the unanswered question regarding gravitational attraction is acceptable along with denial that gravitational attraction is the product of a force or energy with no physical component. Father, neither you nor Albert Einstein can change the fact, as expressed in the Nicene Creed, that God the father, the creator of all things, is involved in the physics of creation which cannot be divorced from the physics taught as science in the class room. The two are one and the same.

While it is taught in our schools that all things are made of atoms assembled from electrons, protons and neutrons and that those components are bound together to give existence, it is not taught and by that omission it is denied and concealed, that there is an energy involved that provides the force that produces the binding of those components and from there a priori, all things in the universe. It is also not taught that the energy that produces the binding of atoms is in fact the mechanism that gives atoms and therefore a priori, all things, the ability to function, to do what atoms do. That fact concerning the fundamental component of all things that modern science refuses to accept and acknowledge even though observed and measured, is sent packing down the hall with you, modern science and advocates of Intelligent Design in tow.

Father, you are wrong to concede to the notion that it is after all, all right to allow that the truth concerning the fundamental principle of physics and creation in science is being deliberately denied and concealed from our parents and children in school on the assumption that parents would somehow acquire the ability to see through and correct the problem especially since the best we can get from church is the Nicene Creed.

Miles Pelton

More a priori

The expression “a priori” that seemed to be a favorite of Albert Einstein means essentially, derived through the process of reasoning. It is akin to the process employed by the author of the book of Ecclesiastes of the Old Testament wherein the author determined a priori that without the concept of creation, everything is meaningless, like chasing the wind. It is akin to the process used to establish that all things in the universe are made of atoms that are in turn the assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons, and the energy that bind those components to give atoms their physical and behavioral characteristics as well as their ability to behave, and subsequently the physical and behavioral characteristics of all things. Without that a priori derived basis, everything is meaningless, like chasing the wind.
So it is in the pursuit of understanding when considering the principles of physics. Meaning is forthcoming when a priori is allowed to work. For example; the mysterious process by which heat and light are produced when electrons are forced to move from atom to atom in the filament of a light bulb are made meaningful when a priori is applied without biased restrictions. Consider that the physical composition of light bulbs remain unchanged with nothing additional admitted to cause the production of heat and light except electrons where the same number of electrons exit as enters the bulb so it is not the electrons that are consumed in the production of the heat and light. Further, since the energy applied to produce movement of electrons through the electrical power system is consumed by that action, it is not available to be consumed in the bulb to produce heat and light. However, since the links of force that bind electrons in the formation of the atoms of which the lamp filament is made are fragmented when electrons are moved from atom to atom, it must be concluded a priori that it is the energy of those binding links that is released in the form of heat and light.
While the example conclusion provides some understanding of the phenomena involved in the production of light and heat, it does not explain why, if heat and light have a common source, they have different behavioral characteristics. Continuation of the a priori process to establish an explanation begins by considering that the electron binding links involve the principles of gravitational attraction developed by Sir Isaac Newton. Newton’s theory states essentially that; inherent in every body (assembly of atoms) is an “affinity” for another body (assembly of atoms) with the strength of that “affinity” in proportion to the mass of the constituent components of the body in each instance. Newton established that the “affinity” force originated from the core center of the mass of which the assembly is made. Then a priori, it stands that each proton or neutron would have an originating center for its inherent “affinity” force and that each assembly of protons and neutrons and electrons (atoms) would then each have an “affinity” center. The concept of multiple centers from which gravitational force is exerted was defined by August Mobius (1790–1868) as a barycenter. NASA explains the term barycenter at http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/baryctr.shtml and Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/barycenter.
Including the barycenter concept into the light bulb analogy establishes a priori that there are two binding links fragmented as each electron is moved from atom to atom along the lamp filament. There is a weaker constant strength link (producing heat) that binds the electron to a proton barycenter/core-center and a varying strength atom specific link (producing light) that binds the electron to the atom barycenter/core-enter. It is the later varying strength atom specific binding link that produces a variation in light color peculiar to each type atom.
Meaninglessness associated with the heat/light phenomenon is considerably diminished with the preceding explanation. Any remaining meaninglessness is removed by continuing the a priori process to track the source of the “affinity” producing force by recognizing a procession of barycenters/core-centers passing through the assembly of the Universe, first through the center of the Earth, then the Sun, then the Milky Way and eventually the center of the Universe itself from whence a priori, the energy fundamental to physics originates. Beyond that point, a priori deals with matters in the realm of religion.

Global Warming - A Function Of Heat

It is not the purpose of this paper to challenge global warming but to ask and then try to answer a few simple questions. If warming is a function of heat, why is global warming attributed to “greenhouse gases” rather than to heat? If it is the nature of heat to move from a place of greater heat concentration to places of lower heat concentration, why is it alleged that the heat “trapped” within the relatively cool “greenhouse gases” moves to the relatively warmer earths surface? If the layer of “greenhouse gases” is not blocking the solar contribution why do they block heat trying to leave the earth? Could it be that the “greenhouse gas theory” is defective?

The short answer to those questions resides with the fact that our understanding of the phenomenon called heat is defective. Dictionary[i] explanation is that heat is the energy associated with the motion of atoms or molecules. Encyclopedia[ii] explains that heat is energy in transit that always flows from a substance at higher temperature to the substance at a lower temperature. A search of college level textbooks[iii] produced equally vague explanation of the way heat behaves, not what heat is. Without definition of the energy that produces the effect called heat, which in turn is a function of global warming, it stands that global warming theories are likewise defective. It is important to note that Albert Einstein included heat in the category of electromagnetic radiation, which he considered to be one of the four mysterious fundamental forces of Physics (creation) for which he was unable to define a causing energy.

Understanding of the fundamental forces of Physics begins by recognition that all things in the Universe are made of atoms of matter that are in turn made of electrons, protons, neutrons and the energy that binds those elemental components into the various atoms. Stated in another way; all things in the Universe (including heat) derived their behavioral characteristics as well as their ability to behave (their energy), through those four elemental components of which atoms are made. To aid in understanding, recognize that the energy that produces the binding of the elemental components into atoms is the same energy that is manifest as gravity or gravitational attraction. It is the same energy that produces the “attraction” of protons for electrons, which is manifest as the energy that binds electrons in orbit in atoms and which binds atoms in forming molecules. Why our eyes are closed to these well-proven Physics principles is a far greater mystery than is the cause of global warming.

The source for the energy called heat is repeatedly demonstrated every time an incandescent light is turned on. By that act, an electric current is made to flow along the filament of the light bulb which is made of atoms of tungsten that are in turn made of electrons, protons, neutrons and the energy that bind those components to make the tungsten atoms. By that act, the energy recognized as heat and light (electromagnetic radiation) are released and emitted from the lamp filament. Since the quantity of electrons leaving the lamp is the same as the quantity that entered the lamp, it is obvious that the heat and light produced is not the result of their consumption. Since the lamp filament is not consumed it is obvious that it is not the atoms of the filament that are consumed to produce the observed light and heat. That leaves only one other potential source; the energy that binds the electrons to the nucleus of the tungsten atoms which bond is fractured each time an electron is forced to moved from one atom to another along the lamp filament. Each gaining atom establishes a new bond with the traveling electron while the electron binding energy of the losing atom is released in the form of heat and or light. There is a fundamental point that must be taken from this explanation. Heat, all heat, regardless of the cause of its release, is the “residue” of the energy employed in binding electrons, protons and neutrons to form atoms.

Since the energy that produces the reactions called heat is not visible, definition of its nature and behavioral characteristics must be drawn based upon reactions discerned through observation of the affects of those reactions. For example: observations documented in textbooks show that materials expand when heated and when heated sufficiently, the atomic structure is destroyed to release additional heat (and light) as occurs in the process called combustion or oxidation. Textbooks also document that it is the expansion of the atomic structure of materials through the application of heat that causes materials to be transformed from solid to liquid and liquid to gaseous states, which under certain circumstances produces explosive forces. Of particular interest in the Global Warming problem, observations have established that, except when in the form of photons, heat cannot transit empty space (a vacuum) which characteristics forms the basis for thermos bottles. That is to say; heat can exist and migrate only as a component of an atom and since heat always seeks to move from substances where temperature is higher to substances where temperature is lower, it says that atoms existing at lower temperature pull (attract) heat from atoms existing with higher temperature. In other words, heat doesn’t move because it has a mind to move. Heat moves because atoms with a stronger power of attraction are pulling it from atoms with a less strong power of attraction. There is another fundamental point that must be taken from this explanation as well. Heat, the residue of atomic binding energy that is attracted by the core center of atoms after release, saps the strength of the core centers leaving less binding power and thereby allowing expansion of the atom.

A misconception persists that the atmosphere functions as a blanket to keep the heat of the earth from escaping which is utterly false. It is the emptiness of space that prevents the transfer of heat away from the earth just as the emptiness of the vacuum in a vacuum bottle prevents the transfer of heat. It is true that the ability of the atmosphere to transmit heat diminishes as the density of atoms diminishes with altitude. Said in other words, it is not “green house gases” that are responsible for global warming. Global warming is a function of the quantity of heat (atomic binding energy) released within the vacuum bottle called earth and it makes no difference what is causing the release of heat energy. Heat is released when the photons of sunlight or artificial light are fractured upon impact as well as in the functioning of a light-producing source. Heat is released in powering electrical generation or planes and cars regardless of the type fuel consumed. Sure, it is always possible to get “more bang for the buck” but any thing that causes electrons to be transferred from atom to atom releases heat.

Sighting an increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide as the cause of global warming is another misconception. Unless heated, carbon dioxide molecules are heavier, that is denser, than are the other components of the atmosphere, so the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a function of heating. Stated in other words, it is an increase in the amount of heat at the surface of the earth that is causing the noted increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and, if the carbon dioxide molecules were not holding the heat, some other matter such as the soil or water would hold it.

So where does this all leave us? Is global warming a sign of the end of the world? Is there no salvation? Is a drastic change in life style in order and would that make a difference? Or are the behavioral characteristics built into the physics of creation capable of compensating for the situation? There is evidence that those built-in characteristics (mother nature) succeeded in compensating for this type situation in the past. Not too many years ago a global ice age gave a similar ominous message but those behavioral characteristics built into the physics of creation corrected that situation without the intervention of man. Perhaps our fears stem simply from a lack of appreciation for those capabilities that are built-in. Certainly a continuing concerted effort must be applied to keep our home clean such as was done to clean up the Pittsburgh of the 30’s, the Los Angeles of the 50’s and the ongoing effort at chemicals cleanup. But, do we want to build giant reflectors to deflect the solar transmitted photons or will an increase in temperature produce greater cloud cover that would have a similar effect, albeit while being faced with greater precipitation and greater prevalence of storms? If we opened our eyes to the truth regarding the physics of creation could we devise a method of extracting heat from our atmosphere to do work that now involves the release of heat in response to electron transfer (i.e.: heat recycling) and thereby help control the temperature of the atmosphere?

[i] The American Heritage Dictionary, Second College Edition, Copyright © 1983 by Houghton Mifflin Company
[ii] Microsoft Corporation Copyright © 1993-2005
[iii] Modern College Physics, Modern Asia Edition, Copyright © 1948, 1953, 1956 by D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. and General College Chemistry, Second Edition Copyright © 1963 by Harper & Row

Ordered Order

Order came with the creation of atoms of matter that are the fundamental building blocks of all things in the universe. Atoms are assemblies of electrons, protons, neutrons and the energy that provides the force that binds those components to give existence to atoms and thereby to all things. Thus the energy that produces the force that binds electrons, protons, and neutrons to produce atoms is considered a priori to be the instrument by which order was created out of chaos and the author of that energy is considered a priori as the almighty “orderer of order.”
By all indications, humans have from the beginning employed the superior intellect with which endowed to deny the existence of the instrument of order and thereby the orderer of order. Such was the case when Sir Isaac Newton, after contemplating an apple falling from a tree, concluded it to be “inconceivable that the force of gravity was innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body could act upon another at a distance, without the mediation of anything else, so that their action and force could be conveyed from the one body to another.” A serious void was left in Newton’s conclusions because he was unwilling to acknowledge gravitational attraction as the instrument ordered to produce order in the universe.
Some 200 years later in an effort to explain away the void in physics principles left by Newton, Albert Einstein advanced a succession of theories to argue that the instrument of order Newton called gravitational attraction is not real but rather an illusion that he initially attributed to an “equivalence principle” but later attributed to the “warping of space-time.” Neither theory was proven or is conclusively provable but, since they circumvent acknowledging the existence of an instrument by which order is instilled in the building blocks of all things and from there a priori, an almighty orderer of order, the Einstein theories are embraced by and serve as argument by the practitioners of relativism commonly designated as “liberals.”
The argument presented may seem of little consequence until realized that the same orderer of order that created matter from chaos, creates all order. Without an orderer of order there is an amorphous void, confusion and disorder since conscious behavior is influenced by what is believed, which explains the philosophy embodied by the Judeo/Christian/Muslim religious faiths and psychology practice. That principle is fundamental to and transcends physics, religion, government and justice functions to provide a structure through which order is established. It is the movement to circumvent or compartmentalize recognition of that common orderer of order that fuels the divisiveness that pervades science, religion and politics that is seen revealed in matters such as the evolution versus creation, the Roe versus Wade, and the Orthodox versus Progressive arguments that often lead to war including such as the current Islamic jihad.
Denial of the instrument by which order is created is indicated to be manifestation of the original sin documented in Genesis that involved the eating of an apple that fell from a tree.