Modern Science
This post is in response to an item by Father Jonathan published on Fox News, 15 Febtruary. The full effect may not be evident without benefit of the Father Jonathan article.
Duck, the Good Book is on its way. You have fallen for the trap that the practitioners of Relativism employ. You rationalize that we now have a “modern” science so that it is now OK to exclude the practice of a priori as was done in the past, as not admissible as science because that involves some degree of philosophy. Albert Einstein, the father of modern physics used a priori in developing his Theory of Relativity. Einstein summarily dismissed a priori the concept of gravitational attraction then espoused by the community of scientists since the concepts involved “seemed quite contrary to everyday experience”.
By that assertion Einstein sent the question of how or by what manner material points could act upon one another at-a-distance, packing down the hall. By that assertion Einstein made acceptable to “modern” scientists, that denial of the unanswered question regarding gravitational attraction is acceptable along with denial that gravitational attraction is the product of a force or energy with no physical component. Father, neither you nor Albert Einstein can change the fact, as expressed in the Nicene Creed, that God the father, the creator of all things, is involved in the physics of creation which cannot be divorced from the physics taught as science in the class room. The two are one and the same.
While it is taught in our schools that all things are made of atoms assembled from electrons, protons and neutrons and that those components are bound together to give existence, it is not taught and by that omission it is denied and concealed, that there is an energy involved that provides the force that produces the binding of those components and from there a priori, all things in the universe. It is also not taught that the energy that produces the binding of atoms is in fact the mechanism that gives atoms and therefore a priori, all things, the ability to function, to do what atoms do. That fact concerning the fundamental component of all things that modern science refuses to accept and acknowledge even though observed and measured, is sent packing down the hall with you, modern science and advocates of Intelligent Design in tow.
Father, you are wrong to concede to the notion that it is after all, all right to allow that the truth concerning the fundamental principle of physics and creation in science is being deliberately denied and concealed from our parents and children in school on the assumption that parents would somehow acquire the ability to see through and correct the problem especially since the best we can get from church is the Nicene Creed.
Miles Pelton
Duck, the Good Book is on its way. You have fallen for the trap that the practitioners of Relativism employ. You rationalize that we now have a “modern” science so that it is now OK to exclude the practice of a priori as was done in the past, as not admissible as science because that involves some degree of philosophy. Albert Einstein, the father of modern physics used a priori in developing his Theory of Relativity. Einstein summarily dismissed a priori the concept of gravitational attraction then espoused by the community of scientists since the concepts involved “seemed quite contrary to everyday experience”.
By that assertion Einstein sent the question of how or by what manner material points could act upon one another at-a-distance, packing down the hall. By that assertion Einstein made acceptable to “modern” scientists, that denial of the unanswered question regarding gravitational attraction is acceptable along with denial that gravitational attraction is the product of a force or energy with no physical component. Father, neither you nor Albert Einstein can change the fact, as expressed in the Nicene Creed, that God the father, the creator of all things, is involved in the physics of creation which cannot be divorced from the physics taught as science in the class room. The two are one and the same.
While it is taught in our schools that all things are made of atoms assembled from electrons, protons and neutrons and that those components are bound together to give existence, it is not taught and by that omission it is denied and concealed, that there is an energy involved that provides the force that produces the binding of those components and from there a priori, all things in the universe. It is also not taught that the energy that produces the binding of atoms is in fact the mechanism that gives atoms and therefore a priori, all things, the ability to function, to do what atoms do. That fact concerning the fundamental component of all things that modern science refuses to accept and acknowledge even though observed and measured, is sent packing down the hall with you, modern science and advocates of Intelligent Design in tow.
Father, you are wrong to concede to the notion that it is after all, all right to allow that the truth concerning the fundamental principle of physics and creation in science is being deliberately denied and concealed from our parents and children in school on the assumption that parents would somehow acquire the ability to see through and correct the problem especially since the best we can get from church is the Nicene Creed.
Miles Pelton
posted by Miles Pelton @ 11:26 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home