Creation Physics versus Classical and Relativistic Physics
CREATION PHYSICS VERSUS CLASSICAL AND RELATIVISTIC PHYSICS
By: Miles Pelton
By definition (MSN Encarta) Physics is the scientific study of matter, energy, force and motion, and the way they relate to each other. Therefore, since that definition encompasses the fundamental components of all things, then it stands that Physics is the scientific study of creation.
Through analytical study supported by reasoning (a priori) the human mind has been able to recognize that the fundamental components involved in the evolutionary process of creation are bound together by divine-in-nature forces to form physical matter. Then it must follow that the cause of those divine-in-nature forces are a behavioral characteristic inherent in the fundamental components themselves. In other words, an affinity or attraction-for-self is a behavioral characteristic inherent in each fundamental component, which behavioral characteristic is the cause of the divine-in-nature binding force. However, if self-attraction affinity were the sole behavioral characteristic of the elemental energy particles fundamental to the creation of physical matter, then any quantity of such particles would exist as a singularity with no physical presence while at the same time possessing a divine-in-nature presence equal to the quantity of particles. In other words, describing the situation reasoned by many Physicists to have preceded “the big bang”.
Taking a position that nothing (no matter, no space, no time) existed prior to the big-bang except a singularity made of an enormous quantity of divine-in-nature self-attracting energy particles, the only thing able to create the big-bang would be the addition of a self-repelling behavioral characteristic to the elemental energy particles. That single act would have introduced space and distance between the elemental energy particles resulting in an instantaneous expansion reaction to expose the physics principles we seek to understand through the study of matter, energy, force, and motion, and the way they relate to each other.
While a duality of forces are acknowledged to be involved in creating matter, there is near absolute refusal by both the Classical and the Relativistic Physicists to accept that it is the characteristics of the fundamental components of matter that is the cause of the divine-in-nature binding forces because that conclusion requires acknowledging the existence of a creator of those components as well as a supplier of the power that sustains those behavioral characteristics. It is those conclusions that separate the beliefs of the Classical and Relativistic Physicists from the beliefs of Creation Physicists. Meanwhile, it is that disavowed supplier of the energy of which all things are created and sustained that is believed by some to be their God.
By: Miles Pelton
By definition (MSN Encarta) Physics is the scientific study of matter, energy, force and motion, and the way they relate to each other. Therefore, since that definition encompasses the fundamental components of all things, then it stands that Physics is the scientific study of creation.
Through analytical study supported by reasoning (a priori) the human mind has been able to recognize that the fundamental components involved in the evolutionary process of creation are bound together by divine-in-nature forces to form physical matter. Then it must follow that the cause of those divine-in-nature forces are a behavioral characteristic inherent in the fundamental components themselves. In other words, an affinity or attraction-for-self is a behavioral characteristic inherent in each fundamental component, which behavioral characteristic is the cause of the divine-in-nature binding force. However, if self-attraction affinity were the sole behavioral characteristic of the elemental energy particles fundamental to the creation of physical matter, then any quantity of such particles would exist as a singularity with no physical presence while at the same time possessing a divine-in-nature presence equal to the quantity of particles. In other words, describing the situation reasoned by many Physicists to have preceded “the big bang”.
Taking a position that nothing (no matter, no space, no time) existed prior to the big-bang except a singularity made of an enormous quantity of divine-in-nature self-attracting energy particles, the only thing able to create the big-bang would be the addition of a self-repelling behavioral characteristic to the elemental energy particles. That single act would have introduced space and distance between the elemental energy particles resulting in an instantaneous expansion reaction to expose the physics principles we seek to understand through the study of matter, energy, force, and motion, and the way they relate to each other.
While a duality of forces are acknowledged to be involved in creating matter, there is near absolute refusal by both the Classical and the Relativistic Physicists to accept that it is the characteristics of the fundamental components of matter that is the cause of the divine-in-nature binding forces because that conclusion requires acknowledging the existence of a creator of those components as well as a supplier of the power that sustains those behavioral characteristics. It is those conclusions that separate the beliefs of the Classical and Relativistic Physicists from the beliefs of Creation Physicists. Meanwhile, it is that disavowed supplier of the energy of which all things are created and sustained that is believed by some to be their God.
posted by Miles Pelton @ 1:21 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home