Formless Mass Cloaked In Darkness

The Genesis version of creation makes no specific mention of energy being provided with which things were made and formed. It was sufficient for the author to establish that the Spirit of God was hovering over its surface. Of course since this accounting is just a synopsis of a sequence of events and not definition of the processes involved, it is left to the reader to conclude that not only was the Spirit of God expended to make something out of that formless mass, to give existence to all things, but to supply the energy required to give all things the ability to function, to exist, to behave. If, as we now believe, all things were made of atoms that are themselves made of electrons, protons, and neutrons, it is logical to believe provisions had been made for a supply of energy with which to bind those components to give them existence and the ability to exist, regardless of the origin of that energy. If not, there never would have been even one atom.
While that point does not seem too difficult to understand it remains for whatever reason cloaked in darkness. It is denied, ignored and even vehemently countered with senseless chaff by self-anointed intellects while alleging to be promoting the search for truth. The expenditure of energy (an effort) is required before a force can be applied, before work can be done. While matter may possess the potential to apply force or do work, it cannot acquire that potential except or unless energy was first expended to establish that potential. Staying on point, an atom cannot be made to produce force or do work unless energy is expended to establish that capability. That is, if energy was not expended to produce the binding forces that give the atom existence and its ability to behave as an atom behaves, then an atom could do nothing. Further, if energy was not expended in binding the components of an atom together, then no energy would/could be expended in breaking the bonds established by those energy-produced bindings.
While that point too does not seem difficult to understand, consider the convoluted explanation for binding energy as published by Wikipedia. Binding energy is the energy required to disassemble a whole into separate parts. A bound system has a lower potential energy than its constituent parts. At the nuclear level, binding energy is derived from the strong nuclear force and is the energy required to disassemble a nucleus into neutrons and protons. Because a bound system is at a lower energy level, its mass must be less than its unbound constituents. Nuclear binding energy can be computed from the difference in mass of a nucleus and the sum of the mass of the neutrons and protons that make up the nucleus. Once the mass difference is known, the equation E=Mc2 can be used to compute the binding energy of any nucleus. Cloaked in darkness?
Staying on point, it is true that if one knew the magnitude of energy applied to separate the components of a nucleus one would know the magnitude of the energy applied to the binding of those components. But, would the individual components gain binding force producing energy just because they were taken out of binding range? Perhaps the more poignant question should be, how much of the binding force producing energy was being used since the force produced diminishes inversely as the square of the distance but the magnitude of the force producing potential is in direct proportion to the amount of matter that makes up the assembly? When thought through it should be apparent that it is the amount of energy applied that changes in each instance and not the magnitude of the ability to produce binding force. It is the amount of matter involved that establishes the magnitude of binding force while it is the /d2 factor (inversely proportional to the square of the distance) that determines the magnitude of the force applied by a certain energy magnitude. The amount of matter that makes up a proton or neutron is eternally constant but the distance over which the binding action takes place is not a constant. A mind capable of clear thinking would recognize that the binding force center of an assembly of matter such as an atom, where the magnitude of binding energy is a function of the amount of matter but the quantity expended is a function of the /d2 factor, would have any unused portion of its binding force producing energy available to establish bonds with, for example, the electrons of other atoms. It would have the power to attract.
Part of the problem associated with removing the cloak of darkness from creation physics involves the fact that our ability to recognize events is limited by the senses with which we are endowed along with our reasoning capability. Consider the difficulties experienced in recognizing the existence of neutrons even though they have a physical component. A problem arose because the instrumentation developed to detect matter, specifically the spectrometer, is impotent unless said matter carries an electrical charge or can be made to carry an electric charge. That impotency of the spectrometer was resolved in the case of neutrons because their physical properties could be sensed and validated by other means, which is not the case with the energy that produces the fundamental atomic binding force. The spectrometer that operates on the principles associated with electrical charges is incapable of detecting that component of atoms that produces the binding forces since the energy that produces those forces does not function in response to electrical charges. Spectrometer tests on atoms are interpreted to indicate that the mass of an atom is not as great as the sum of the masses of the protons, neutrons and electrons contained in the atom because it cannot detect the energy that produces the binding of the atom. To add to the problem, recognize that binding energy unused in the binding of a specific atom’s components due to the /d2 factor, resides within the atom to exert attraction force interaction with the material involved in the assembly and operation of the spectroscope to further distort test results. The impact of these factors would increase as the size of an atom increases so would be greater with Uranium for example than with Hydrogen.
Test your own logic. If the binding force energy residual at the center of the earth (i.e.: in excess of that needed to bind the earths components due to the /d2 factor) is sufficient to hold the moon in orbit, is it or is it not real? If the force of an atomic explosion is produced by the energy that caused separation of the components of the involved atoms as explained by Wikipedia, where did that energy come from? If some portion of the components of atoms (protons and neutrons) can be converted to supply the energy involved in an atomic explosion, how can protons and neutrons be consistently identical, interchangeable and unchangeable? Does the cloak of darkness leave you confused too? Is it in the best interest of society to leave definition of the principles of creation physics to those who practice relativism?