Imbedded Behavior

For all things there is a beginning and so it is with this universe that is an assembly of minute elemental components and forces. Centuries of research and investigation by renowned physicists has established that all things in this universe that have a physical presence are an assembly of some 90 varieties of eternally precise atoms that are themselves an assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons and a force that binds those components to form the atoms. The physical and behavioral characteristics of those components that are elemental to all atoms are eternally precise. Since these components are elemental to all atoms, and of the things made of atoms, it is thereby self evident that atoms, and all things made of atoms, derive their physical and behavioral characteristics as well as their ability to behave, from those elemental components. There is a further point made by the infamous E = Mc2 equation developed by Albert Einstein. The equation as stated does not, nor did Einstein himself, make allowance for more than one form or kind of energy. It states that all matter, each electron, each proton, each neutron and the energy that produces the force that binds them to make atoms and assemblies of atoms, are made of one energy. How that is accomplished is beyond the intended scope of this paper. That fact is mentioned at this time to insure recognition that there is an energy fundamental to all things and from which all things derive their physical and behavioral characteristics as well as their ability to behave. It goes without the need of proof that the energy of which all things are made is eternally precise in behavior and availability.

It is the behavioral characteristics of that one common (Universal) energy that has no physical component that give the electrons, protons, neutrons and the force that binds those components to form atoms and assemblies of atoms, their own unique physical presence, their own unique behavioral characteristics and the energy that gives them the ability to behave. Therefore, it is the behavioral characteristic of that Universal Energy of which all things are made that sets the foundation for the behavior of all creation.

Understanding the creation process from this perspective makes it possible to gain insight into the nature of the Creator and of the physics principles involved whether from a secular or a religious perspective. It bears repeating. This is an irreducible self-evident truth. All things with a physical presence are made from a single form of energy that has no physical component but possess specific behavioral characteristics, that is assembled into elemental particles that are in turn the building blocks for everything physical in the universe. The argument of this statement is true whether or not there are any intervening processes involved in converting that single form of energy into those elemental building blocks called electrons, protons and neutrons since electrons, protons and neutrons and the energy involved in their assembly, are the constituent components of all things physical in the universe. That is an established fact. Their method of construction or assembly, the explanation of which is beyond the purpose of this paper, does not change the fact that these elemental particles are the building blocks of all things physical in the universe, an irreducible self-evident truth.

All electrons, as are protons, neutrons and the particles of the binding force, are identical and eternally precise. An electron now employed in the working of the computer being used to write these words is interchangeable in all aspects with an electron even from the farthest reaches of the universe regardless of the application in which employed. So it is with neutrons and protons. The behavioral characteristics of each type of the elemental particles are eternally identical in each case. Further, the assembly of elemental particles always proceeds in a specific order in building block fashion.

The next order in the process of producing physical matter involves the assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons and their binding forces, into atoms. The assembly of those elemental particles into atoms always produces a physical component with eternally unique behavioral characteristics that varies according to the number of protons employed in forming the nucleus of the atom. Electrons, protons and neutrons will not assemble except in the form of an atom that possesses a specific eternally unique behavioral characteristic. In fact, a single isolated proton constitutes an atom of hydrogen. More correctly, (as established by Particle Physicists) a neutron that has ejected an electron becomes in fact a proton, which also is in fact an atom of hydrogen. Each atomic assembly involving a given number of each sub-elemental particle possesses the same eternally identical behavioral characteristics as every other such assembly anywhere in the universe but a variation in the number or arrangement of sub-elemental particles alters the physical and behavioral characteristics of the assembly. For example, a hydrogen atom consisting of an isolated proton has different characteristics than a proton with an orbiting electron, which in turn has different characteristics than a hydrogen atom with a proton and two orbiting electrons. The important point is that, while each elemental particle used in the assembly of elemental components retains it’s own peculiar behavioral characteristics, each unique assembly is endowed with its own unique physical and behavioral characteristics different from the characteristics of the sub-elemental particles and, if disassembled, the unique characteristics of the sub-elemental particles are again discernable. That is, when electrons with their unique behavioral characteristics are assembled with protons and neutrons with their individual unique behavioral characteristics, the resulting assembly produces a new physical entity with behavioral characteristic that are unique to that specific assembly anywhere in the universe. Thereby, an assembly of seventy-nine protons, neutrons and electrons always produces an atom of gold that possess behavioral characteristics unique to gold no matter where in the universe that assembly is located. Said in other words, the unique behavior characteristics of the electrons, protons and neutrons are used in this case to produce the behavior characteristics of gold. When an atom of gold is disassembled the elemental particles of which made or the energy those particles are made of, are again independently discernible.

There are several key revelations in the preceding analysis.
§ Energy possessing no physical component produces forces that have no physical component (as in the forces of gravity and electricity) that act upon physical matter to affect the behavior of such physical matter such as to hold electrons, protons and neutrons to form atoms. Those forces with no physical component not only exhibit their own unique eternal built in behavioral characteristics but also when acting upon physical matter, produce physical reactions.

§ Each type of elemental physical particle employed in building the universe possesses a built-in behavior characteristic that is unique to and eternally possessed by that type of elemental particle no matter where existing or how employed. Those elemental physical particles are not only the building blocks with which all the remainder of the physical universe is built, but their unique behavioral characteristics are elemental elements in building the behavioral characteristics of subsequent assemblies as well.

§ By combining the physical and behavioral characteristics of the referenced energy and elemental particles, new unique particles called atoms are built which possess new unique built in physical and behavioral characteristics. In each case, the nature of the physical and behavioral characteristics is determined by the arrangement of the elemental particles used in their assembly.

§ These revelations that are key to the understanding of all things, including The Creator and creation, are fact recognized by such renowned Physicists as Albert Einstein.

An extremely important capability exists embedded and hidden within the described processes that are fundamental to life. While not physically discernible, that capability should be recognizable to those familiar with basic physics or chemistry or those who understand how microprocessors work. Consider that the electron and proton, the principal ingredients in every particle of matter, are also the principal ingredients in the establishment of electrical potentials and electrical circuits. Then recognize that with electrical force, electrons can be moved from atom to atom to produce changes in the behavioral characteristics of atoms (or molecules) including the ability to create a variety of “electrical power situations” such as the “miniature batteries” of ATP (adenosine tri-phosphate) that provide the energy that powers the activity of living cells. Also recognize that electrical force can be employed to produce “physical” forces and thereby movement of physical matter as occurs for example in muscle cells. Then recognize that atoms of matter, each with their own eternally precise unique behavioral characteristics, can be assembled in such a manner as to provide built-in logic that can be used to make decisions to control life processes, as in the process of regulating pulse and respiratory rates for example. That process is employed within the cells of living things by such activities as the DNA, the Mitochondria, proteins, and by other inner cellular organ such as are involved in making muscle, brain or nerve cells function for example. This is proven truth, not a myth or theory.

By looking back over the processes just described, one factor stands out. It is called behavior as though the first objective was to establish elemental building components with behavioral characteristics that could be assembled to produce more complex assemblies whose behavioral characteristics could be used to build even more complex behavioral controlled assemblies. Doesn’t it make sense then that behavior is the objective upon which the current “physical world” is dependent, another irreducible truth? Could creation have been successful without eternally precise behavior at each step of the process? The answer is obvious and highlights the fact that the behavioral characteristics of those elemental components that are fundamental to the development of the Universe were willed through the intelligent application of wisdom. It is totally beyond any stretch of comprehension to accept that the behavioral characteristics of those four keystones to creation just happened to be established by chance.

As the creation process was extended through the many levels of increasingly complex sophistication, the ability to control behavior became more and more complex and vulnerable to modification through the application of individual will or malfunction of the embedded processes. With lower forms of animals, behavior was sufficiently controllable with instincts and logic capabilities produced by built-in behavioral characteristics. The ultimate test for behavioral control came with the creation of a being whose brain was sufficiently sophisticated as to provide the ability to rationalize, to store knowledge and recall with recombination. In a word, such beings had the ability to learn so as to understand. To achieve intellect capacity so as to mirror the image of the Creator would require the ability to exercise that capacity without restriction. That is, to exercise freewill.

The big question then is how to regulate the behavior of a thing that has the ability to make conscious behavior decisions in response to freewill? Seen after the fact, the process is not that complicated. With the ability to learn so as to understand, for example that certain behavior produces bad results while other behavior produces good results, a being with that capability would learn to direct freewill decisions to achieve good results and to avoid behavior that produces bad results, based upon what they believe. The behavior-controlling factor then becomes what is believed. Some may believe that killing, as with Cain and Able, is good. So how is belief controlled? By letting it be made clearly obvious that right behavior will be accepted and wrong behavior will be punished. That is not so difficult to understand. Most parents know that but that still doesn’t establish what constitutes right behavior and what constitutes wrong behavior. The answer rests with a simple fundamental principle. Recognize (believe) there is a creator and love (will the good of) the creator (not a representing idol) before anything else. That simple believe will generally result in freewill decisions that constitute acceptable behavior. It helps to accept the creator as God and to recognize Jesus as having been God, not a representing idol.

Physics as a science deals with natural phenomena so cannot be divorced from the physics of creation. They are one event.

Follow The Bouncing Ball

All things are made of atoms of matter that are in turn an assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons and the energy that provides the force that bind those components to give them existence and the ability to exist as atoms. Even the neutrons and protons are assembled elementary components and the energy that provides the force that bind those components to give them existence as protons and neutrons.
Basically then, all things are elementary components and the energy that bind them into making things. A hydrogen atom for example is made of one proton, one electron and the energy that provides binding and its behavior is the product of those components. When hydrogen in the presence of oxygen is involved in combustion for example, there is a residue called “heat” and the electrons, protons and neutrons of which those atoms are made are realigned as H2O (water). So where did the released “heat” residue come from? If produced by the conversion of some of the mass (electrons, protons, and neutrons) how could they remain fully functional as electrons, protons and neutrons capable of assembly as H2O? The energy that provided the force that bound the Hydrogen and Oxygen atoms before combustion became the residue called “heat.” In the process of recombining as H2O molecules, a new core center (barycenter or center of gravity) was established with binding energy supplied through the universal gravitational attraction system.
All energy originates as the energy supplied as a fundamental component of atoms to produce the forces of binding with the residue after being expended, reduced to a form now customarily called “heat.” The way that energy is applied, that is the mechanics of application, are varied but the energy fundamental to the assembly of matter is the origin of all energy and in the end, all that remains after being expended, is “heat.” It makes no difference whether through decay, chemical action, combustion, or nuclear explosion (all the same thing) the residue of the energy that gave them existence and the capability to exist, is “heat”. Even what we perceive as light, remember light is not light without eyes to see, produced in the energy expending process ends as heat. (Consider the reaction when light photons impact matter.) So what is heat?
If heat is the residue of broken links of atomic binding energy, how does the residue of binding energy produce heat? People generally would conclude it is because that is what binding energy is made of. Actually, what is called “heat” is the reaction produced by the binding energy residue not the residue itself. We sense heat because our senses and brain interpret the pain signal from a cell damaged by the residue of expended binding energy as heat.
Consider the behavioral characteristics of heat. First, heat can exist and move only when absorbed by an atom or assembly of atoms or when being drawn (called radiation) by the attracting force of an atom or assembly of atoms. Second, heat is attracted to the atom or assembly of atoms that exerts the strongest binding force, wherein intervening distance is a factor. When the binding energy of an atom or assembly of atoms is expended attracting heat there is less binding power with which to bind itself and the involved assembly expands. It is in response to that process that materials change state from solid to liquid to gas to plasma. As atoms expand, a point is reached where bonds with their electrons or the electrons of other bonded atoms, are fragmented to release the residue of the energy that formed those bonds as “heat. In some cases, depending upon the characteristics of the structure of the atoms involved, the process progresses to a point where a chain reaction results in combustion or explosion and it does not matter whether the bonds fragmented were between the atom core center and orbiting electrons, between the core center and the nucleons of atom nuclei, or between the individual nucleons themselves.
Curious minds then may question the eventual repository for this energy residue. It would be nice to think that it gets recycled. Perhaps it eventually will. In the meantime there are at least two indicators of the life process remaining for energy residue. For one, it continues to raise the temperature of the mass where in it takes residence. As it raises temperature it causes expansion and is undoubtedly responsible for the ever-expanding universe. The solar wind, the energy residue from the sun, which flows out into space to serve no apparent useful purpose, is a graphic illustration of what happens when the ability to accommodate heat is exceeded. Even a significant portion of the energy filled photons emitted by the sun is dissipated in space with no evidence of being recycled to serve another purpose.
It should be obvious that the bouncing ball has shot a hole in the “Law of Conservation of Energy and Matter”. It has exposed the fact that because there is energy residue then energy is being consumed and if the source of that energy is matter, then matter is being consumed. Since matter is nothing but atoms that are assemblies of electrons, protons and neutrons, it stands that if converted to energy, the integrity of those components would be degraded. They would not only no longer be able to function as electrons, protons or neutrons but would eventually, especially after 12 billion years, be themselves consumed. The theory that matter is converted to produce the energy that binds atoms that is in turn the source of the energy in atomic and nuclear reactions is without basis. It is an unproven concept and incapable of being proven that does not stand up to logical scrutiny.
But where does the bouncing ball come to rest? Follow it from the individual atom, to the moon, to the earth, to the sun, to the center of the Milky Way, to the center of the Universe, the point of origin of the components used to make the first atom that included the first bit of binding energy. Recognize that the force of gravitational attraction that originates at the point where all things originated has the potential to serve as the mechanism by which the energy that produces binding is supplied. That concept sure stands up to logical scrutiny better than the conversion of matter to energy concept whether undertaken by a human or a physicist.

Formless Mass Cloaked In Darkness

The Genesis version of creation makes no specific mention of energy being provided with which things were made and formed. It was sufficient for the author to establish that the Spirit of God was hovering over its surface. Of course since this accounting is just a synopsis of a sequence of events and not definition of the processes involved, it is left to the reader to conclude that not only was the Spirit of God expended to make something out of that formless mass, to give existence to all things, but to supply the energy required to give all things the ability to function, to exist, to behave. If, as we now believe, all things were made of atoms that are themselves made of electrons, protons, and neutrons, it is logical to believe provisions had been made for a supply of energy with which to bind those components to give them existence and the ability to exist, regardless of the origin of that energy. If not, there never would have been even one atom.
While that point does not seem too difficult to understand it remains for whatever reason cloaked in darkness. It is denied, ignored and even vehemently countered with senseless chaff by self-anointed intellects while alleging to be promoting the search for truth. The expenditure of energy (an effort) is required before a force can be applied, before work can be done. While matter may possess the potential to apply force or do work, it cannot acquire that potential except or unless energy was first expended to establish that potential. Staying on point, an atom cannot be made to produce force or do work unless energy is expended to establish that capability. That is, if energy was not expended to produce the binding forces that give the atom existence and its ability to behave as an atom behaves, then an atom could do nothing. Further, if energy was not expended in binding the components of an atom together, then no energy would/could be expended in breaking the bonds established by those energy-produced bindings.
While that point too does not seem difficult to understand, consider the convoluted explanation for binding energy as published by Wikipedia. Binding energy is the energy required to disassemble a whole into separate parts. A bound system has a lower potential energy than its constituent parts. At the nuclear level, binding energy is derived from the strong nuclear force and is the energy required to disassemble a nucleus into neutrons and protons. Because a bound system is at a lower energy level, its mass must be less than its unbound constituents. Nuclear binding energy can be computed from the difference in mass of a nucleus and the sum of the mass of the neutrons and protons that make up the nucleus. Once the mass difference is known, the equation E=Mc2 can be used to compute the binding energy of any nucleus. Cloaked in darkness?
Staying on point, it is true that if one knew the magnitude of energy applied to separate the components of a nucleus one would know the magnitude of the energy applied to the binding of those components. But, would the individual components gain binding force producing energy just because they were taken out of binding range? Perhaps the more poignant question should be, how much of the binding force producing energy was being used since the force produced diminishes inversely as the square of the distance but the magnitude of the force producing potential is in direct proportion to the amount of matter that makes up the assembly? When thought through it should be apparent that it is the amount of energy applied that changes in each instance and not the magnitude of the ability to produce binding force. It is the amount of matter involved that establishes the magnitude of binding force while it is the /d2 factor (inversely proportional to the square of the distance) that determines the magnitude of the force applied by a certain energy magnitude. The amount of matter that makes up a proton or neutron is eternally constant but the distance over which the binding action takes place is not a constant. A mind capable of clear thinking would recognize that the binding force center of an assembly of matter such as an atom, where the magnitude of binding energy is a function of the amount of matter but the quantity expended is a function of the /d2 factor, would have any unused portion of its binding force producing energy available to establish bonds with, for example, the electrons of other atoms. It would have the power to attract.
Part of the problem associated with removing the cloak of darkness from creation physics involves the fact that our ability to recognize events is limited by the senses with which we are endowed along with our reasoning capability. Consider the difficulties experienced in recognizing the existence of neutrons even though they have a physical component. A problem arose because the instrumentation developed to detect matter, specifically the spectrometer, is impotent unless said matter carries an electrical charge or can be made to carry an electric charge. That impotency of the spectrometer was resolved in the case of neutrons because their physical properties could be sensed and validated by other means, which is not the case with the energy that produces the fundamental atomic binding force. The spectrometer that operates on the principles associated with electrical charges is incapable of detecting that component of atoms that produces the binding forces since the energy that produces those forces does not function in response to electrical charges. Spectrometer tests on atoms are interpreted to indicate that the mass of an atom is not as great as the sum of the masses of the protons, neutrons and electrons contained in the atom because it cannot detect the energy that produces the binding of the atom. To add to the problem, recognize that binding energy unused in the binding of a specific atom’s components due to the /d2 factor, resides within the atom to exert attraction force interaction with the material involved in the assembly and operation of the spectroscope to further distort test results. The impact of these factors would increase as the size of an atom increases so would be greater with Uranium for example than with Hydrogen.
Test your own logic. If the binding force energy residual at the center of the earth (i.e.: in excess of that needed to bind the earths components due to the /d2 factor) is sufficient to hold the moon in orbit, is it or is it not real? If the force of an atomic explosion is produced by the energy that caused separation of the components of the involved atoms as explained by Wikipedia, where did that energy come from? If some portion of the components of atoms (protons and neutrons) can be converted to supply the energy involved in an atomic explosion, how can protons and neutrons be consistently identical, interchangeable and unchangeable? Does the cloak of darkness leave you confused too? Is it in the best interest of society to leave definition of the principles of creation physics to those who practice relativism?

Why Theoretically

The theories expressed herein have been derived through the process of reasoning based upon the concepts embodied by the fundamental principle that all things are made through the assembly of atoms, which are in turn made by the assembly of electrons, protons, neutron and the energy that produces the forces that bind those components to give them existence as well as the capacity by which to exist, as in behave, where the behavior of that binding energy includes the ability to act over distance at a precise speed commonly acknowledged to be 186,000 miles per second (mps). Expansion of that principle leads to the reasoned conclusion that the energy responsible for the binding involved in making electrons, protons, neutrons and atoms, is the energy responsible for producing the forces that binds all things to give them existence and the capacity by which to exist including extension of the behavioral characteristics embodied in those assemblies. Through the process of reasoning it is logical to conclude that the energy that produces the binding of atoms and molecules is the energy that produces the binding force called gravitational attraction (GA) expounded upon by Sir Isaac Newton. Continuing the reasoning process leads to the logical conclusion that, since the bonds of gravitational attraction link all matter in the universe and act lineally from its source at 186,000 mps, those links of gravitational force could be the carrier of photons that produce the effects expounded upon by Albert Einstein. Extension of consideration on the concepts outlined leads to the reasoned conclusion that the fundamental energy embodied within each assembly of matter is continuously replenished through the system of GA created through the behavior of that energy, which system thereby becomes universal.
Recognize that motion is an inherent characteristic of the behavior of the universal energy that produces binding and GA since it acts with a velocity measured at 186,000 mps. Through the process of reasoning it is logical to conclude that this characteristic of this fundamental component of all things, produces the forces that cause motion, especially of photons (light) and electrons, but by extension, all things. Recognize also that distance and time are elements inherent in motion so derive their existence and their ability to exist from that fundamental universal binding energy. Without motion everything would exist at one point so there would be no distance or time.
With no other thing identified as existing with the potential to move things, it is reasonable to conclude that the links of GA that exist between all things is the carrier and mover of light. That inter-connecting link of GA that acts at 186,000 mps is indicated to be the carrier of photons released by the atoms of one body to another body at a distance. However, if the intervening distance changed once the light photons attached to a GA link, then the velocity of that point to point event would be modified resulting in a change in the distance and time elements as well as providing the potential to modify the behavioral characteristics embodied within the photon. For example, by changing the physical length and there by the photon wavelength, which phenomena has been identified as the Doppler effect. Further, when light (or atomic radiation for that matter) is being used to establish the passage of time, a change in distance produces modification of the velocity and thereby the elapsed time of the event, which phenomena is called time dilation.
There is another aspect to the preceding phenomena. With the GA system link between an object and its GA source serving as the carrier by which GA energy is distributed, a change in velocity relative to the source of the GA energy would produce a change in the magnitude of the energy supplied, which would be significant as the velocity of intervening motion approached the velocity of GA energy (186,000 mps). When the relative motion is in a direction to produce an increase in distance (a decrease in velocity), the magnitude of the energy supplied would be reduced thereby reducing the binding power available at the object and the object would expand as to increase in physical size. With an opposite relative motion, an opposite effect would be produced. These are behavior predicted by Einstein.
The concepts expressed have been proven over and over by the likes of Newton and Einstein and serve to explain why these mysterious phenomena occur, which raises the question: why are these concepts only theoretical or faith based and why is a special mysterious system of terms and mathematics needed in a failed attempt to provide explanation?

The Baby That Went With The Bath Water

The 19th century was a busy time in the world of Physics research. Many of the advancements that came to fruition early in the 20th century were the product of those research efforts, not the least of which was development of atomic energy and electromagnetic concepts. Understandably, not all research work proved successful. Notable of these was the now infamous Michelson-Morley experiment. While that effort not only failed to prove the intention of the experiment, it’s failure was taken as proof that the concepts of classic Newtonian physics as pertains to absolute motion were irreparably defective. On the basis of that failed experiment, the concept of absolute and independent realities was summarily discarded in favor of a new concept of relativity. Subsequently, advancement of fundamental physics principles has dwindled. It is a classic case where the baby got thrown out with the bath water.

It is not the intention of this paper to attempt to discredit the concept of relativity. It is rather to assert that absolutes have a place in explaining the fundamental principles of physics and creation.

The first absolute, whether involving an unexplained “big bang”, intelligent design, or chance, is that there is a point of origin. There is a point where and when the first elementary components where produced, including the energy that provides the force used to bind those components to produce the assemblies called atoms, that are the building blocks of all things and through which all things gain their ability to exist and function. That point of origin would, when considered in light of the interaction of fundamental forces, remain a fixed point at the center of creation. It would forever be the point from which the existence and motion of particles began and therefore the point where time began. That point will forever be an absolute.

The second absolute involves the fact that the force of gravitational attraction acts lineally from the core center of creation as well as the core center of every assembly of matter and it interacts with other particles or assemblies, whether between protons and neutrons or between galactic bodies, on that basis. Those interactions of force are not relative. They are absolutes that are not changed just because an observer perceives or sets about to calculate interactions from another perspective. When it comes to the fundamental principles of physics, there is only one perspective, which is from the point of origin.

The third absolute involves the energy that produces the force of gravitational attraction, the force that binds all things, the force that serves as the carrier of photons and electromagnetic propagations, the force known as magnetism, and which acts lineally through space with a velocity that is an absolute scalar quantity constant. Its action is or produces a uniform motion that transcribes distance, which when transcribed as it is at an absolute velocity, marks the passage of time. Therefore, time is embodied in motion, which when involving the energy that produces gravitational attraction, is an absolute. Time from that perspective cannot be united with space. It cannot be warped.

It must be recognized that there is a time when things are relative and a time when things are absolute. Help recover the baby so we can finish giving conservative classical physics its bath. Help restore conservative thought, which is based upon the existence of absolutes.