Creation Fundamentals Part One

Creation Fundamentals Part One
By: Miles Pelton

For the purpose of this writing, the term a priori, defined as “derived through the process of reasoning”, is invoked because the senses with which humans have been endowed are limited in versatility and sensitivity. Often knowledge is not revealed by the senses or knowledge revealed is often incomplete leading to misinterpretation. Take for example light, which is not light but rather a form of energy that makes objects visible that have been bathed with that energy. Or heat that is not hot but is rather a form of energy that acts to cause the expansion of atoms whereupon, when cells are involved, the sensation we call heat or burning is produced. Or combustion that involves the introduction of heat energy to initiate an expansion of atoms that in turn causes the fracturing of the binding forces of molecules that releases additional heat/expansion energy culminating in the chain reaction now explained as the burning of matter. Or even gravity that is interpreted as causing objects to fall when it is rather that gravity pulls objects toward the source of the pulling force. By invoking a priori, knowledge gained through sensed experience can be expanded to reveal important additional and clarifying understanding.

Consider that all things existing in the universe are made of a finite variety of atoms. Then recognize that atoms are in turn an assembly of electrons, protons, neutrons, and the energy that provides the force that binds those components to give the atoms into which assembled and all things into which those atoms are assembled, their behavioral characteristics as well as their ability to behave and to exist. Then through a priori recognize that all matter and energy (whether gravity, electrical, magnetic, chemical, atomic, nuclear, light, heat or life) involved in building and sustaining the universe are provided by and or through those components fundamental to atoms and that all those components originate from a point at the center of the universe. In other words, those fundamental components that originated from a point now the center of the universe are the building blocks of the universe and of all things that exist in the universe, including all of the various forms of energy. Then recognize that it is the behavior characteristics of those components that are fundamental to the behavior of all things.

Notables such as Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), Charles Coulomb (1736-1806), Andre Ampere (1775-1836) and subsequently many others, attempted to explain what they called an “attraction” or a “charge” they determined to be the cause of the forces they were exploring. An equation developed by Coulomb to explain his conclusions regarding the “electromagnetic charge” was essentially the same as the equation developed by Sir Isaac Newton to explain his conclusions regarding “gravitational attraction”. The explanations and equations established by these notables in their effort to define the “charge cause” show that the “charge” fundamental to electricity, magnetism, gravity and the “inverse square law” (as applied to explain the behavior of light), have like behavioral characteristics. There is little room to question that the “charge cause” fundamental to gravitation, electricity, magnetism and light is common to all of those forces. However, since that “charge” is not sensible (using the senses with which humans are endowed) understanding can be gained only by accepting conclusions a priori based upon consideration of the reactions produced by the “charge” upon sensible objects.

One behavioral characteristic of the “charge” common in each of the cited cases is that the intensity, the strength, the power potential, diminishes inversely proportional to the square of the distance from a source point. That conclusion is in consonance with the equation (a = 4 pi r-squared) applicable to determining the area of a sphere at a specified radius and provides a priori evidence that the “charge” originates from a point corresponding to the center of a sphere whereby the charge density is diminished as it spreads to fill the volume of the sphere thus formed as the radius distance increases. That leads to a follow on a priori conclusion that, while a number of such “charges” may act in combination upon a common object, each such “charge” acts independently of other “charges” or in other words, is source specific. Specifically, the charge radiated from the center of the universe is specific to that point while the charge radiated from a proton is specific to that proton and the charge radiated by an assembly such as the earth is specific to that assembly.

Analysis of the preceding understandings collectively a priori reveals a most significant conclusion. Recognize that gravitational attraction (gravity) is a “charge” powered force that is fundamental to the formation (binding together) of protons, neutrons, atoms and assemblies of atoms or in other words, all things. Extensive experimental effort has established that in every instance gravitational force acts from the center of each and every assembly of matter from the simplest atom to assemblies such as the earth, solar systems and even the universe. From there, a priori produces the conclusion that the “divine in nature” energy that powers the force called gravitational attraction or gravity, that binds all things including the universe together, is supplied ceaselessly out of the center of the universe. Therefore, the gravitational attraction powering “charge” that emanates from the center of the universe, where formation of the universe began, is the fundamental of all “energy charges” and the point where study of creation physics should logically begin.

Let study begin with the conclusion a priori that there exists at that point, now the center of the universe, a reservoir of the energy of which all things are made, a universal energy, as recognized by the notable Albert Einstein and documented by the equation E = M c-squared developed to define that conclusion. (That is a conclusion also inherent in the “big bang theory”). Recognize that existing alone with no physical properties, there is no way by which that reservoir of universal energy can be detected or by which a “charge” associated therewith can be detected or measured. However, since sensible “charges” were determined to exist in association with sensible assemblies in the work of the referenced notables, it is reasonable to conclude a priori that there is a “charge” associated with that point, now the center of the universe, which then would be fundamental to all “charges” or in other words, the “charge” through which the universe, and all things therein, is powered. In the same manner certain behavior characteristics can be or have been established for that universal energy. Universal energy is indicated to exist in extremely pure and uniformly precise portions (as neutrinos perhaps) whose principal characteristics, as evidenced by observing the behavior of gravitational attraction forces, are self-constriction and self-attraction. That characteristic also provides explanation for how so much energy can be stored in an extremely small space.

In more recent years, physicists have identified what they called neutrinos that are concluded to be the smallest particle of matter known to exist, which a priori originate along with the “fundamental charge” from the reservoir of Einstein’s universal energy concluded to exist at the center of the universe. Neutrinos possess a characteristic that is extremely significant in understanding fundamental creation. As best scientific study can determine, neutrinos and electrons are the same with the exception that electrons carry a detectable “charge” while the existence of such ”charge” on neutrinos has not been found. The “charge” associated with an electron is the product of a relationship created by its ejection in the transmutation of a neutron into a proton, which process leaves the proton core center with a “charge deficit” that is in turn radiated in an effort to recapture that “charge deficit”. Since neutrinos are not the product of being ejected in the process of neutron transmutation, a “charge” relationship does not exist between neutrinos and protons.

Any charge associated with neutrinos is the product of the relationship established by their ejection from the energy reservoir at the center of the universe. That process leaves the reservoir of energy with a deficit in proportion to the number of neutrinos ejected that is in turn radiated as a “neutrino attraction charge” acting in an effort to recapture the energy ejected as neutrinos. Neutrinos exist within that radiated “charge” that is then in turn impressed upon each neutrino individually. As previously explained, the strength or intensity of the “neutrino attraction charge” impressed upon a neutrino diminishes as the distance from the source center increases. However, since the neutrinos are impressed with a “like charge” even though not necessarily of the same intensity, that charge conveys the power to repel other neutrinos. It is that relationship, established between the reservoir of universal energy and neutrinos that establish the mechanism by which the divine in nature universal energy is able to attain a physical behavior as well as to provide the mechanism by which energy is distributed throughout the universe.

The process would begin with the ejection from the universal energy reservoir from what is now the center of the universe, precisely uniform particles of universal energy in the form known as neutrinos. By that action, the energy reservoir acquires one unit of deficit for each neutrino ejected, which precipitates creation of a corresponding “deficit seeking charge” that is radiated from the center of the universe. The strength of the attracting power of the “deficit seeking charge” (the affinity) grows as the number of ejected neutrinos grows and the neutrinos are pulled towards the charge source but are prevented from being readmitted into the universal energy reservoir by their like charge inter-neutrino repelling force, the strength of which increases as the inter-neutrino distance decreases.

As compaction of the neutrinos progresses, a point is reached where the natural attraction/affinity force of the universal energy of which neutrinos are made, exceeds the repelling force of their impressed “like charge” (that acts between the like charged neutrinos) precipitating the binding together of two neutrinos. With their greater combined attraction power, the two-neutrino assembly attracts a third neutrino and the assembly progresses. At some point the combination of opposing forces and the inverse square law produces equilibrium between opposing forces preventing further growth. The resulting independent assembly, now with physical properties and a mass 1,839 times that of an electron (as documented by Physics textbooks) was identified by James Chadwick (1891-1974) as a neutron.

If left without contamination by outside forces, the self-constricting force within neutrons continues compression thereby reducing intervening distances, which increases the power of the assembly constricting “charge”. Eventually the attraction force on the neutrino nearest the “charge” center is sufficiently powerful to cause separation of the neutrino from its charge whereby the “CHARGE” is ejected from the neutron assembly. By that action the assembly, with 1839 neutrinos but only 1,838 units of “charge”, has acquired a deficit of one “charge” unit, which deficit is then radiated by the assembly as a “charge” and the resulting assembly is known as a proton. The proton, now with considerably altered behavioral characteristics, is the “keystone” in the formation of atoms and thereby of all remaining stages of creation. It is important to recognize that the “charge” radiated by protons establishes a relationship between proton charge centers and ejected “neutrino charges” (called electrons) while the “charge” radiated from the universal energy reservoir center establishes a relationship between that point and neutrinos charged by that charge center.

This explanation is concerned with how the components fundamental to the creation of atoms, and therefore of all physical matter, are made. It does not attempt to explain the source and supplier of the “divine in nature” universal energy that has endured and has been sustained ceaselessly over the billions of years since the process began or of the wisdom inherent in establishing its behavioral characteristics. It likewise does not attempt to explain the possibility or extent of spiritual influences on the processes involved in creation except to note the probability of involvement in development of the DNA code and in efforts to impart control of human being behavior.

Recognition that the efforts of man since prehistoric time has succeeded by accident, trial and error, and intense research, to identify, understand and find ways to use the knowledge and various forms of energy employed in the creation processes, is especially insightful. On the other hand, there is the realization that considerable time and effort have been needlessly expended simply because of refusal to believe and allow recognition that there is a supplier of the wisdom and energy by which all things are made to exist and function.